SEASON 2024-25

AGM Minutes 11th June 2024

Download AGM Minutes in PDF Format

Attendees 
Jeffrey Boardman – Chair (non-voting) 
Julie Denning – Fixtures (non-voting)      
Robert Wall – Treasurer (non-voting) 
(League Officers may have held voting rights on behalf of their clubs)   
Alex Taylor –Collyers                                                       
Brian Stockham – Uckfield (non-voting) 
Jim Wheeler – Hastings                                  
Robert Wall – East Grinstead / Treasurer 
David Fryer – Webmaster/Crowborough   
Anthony Higgs – Horsham 
Colin Clark – Eastbourne                                               
Chris Baldry – Haywards Heath Viv Cole – Haywards Heath                                          
Luke Rutherford – Brighton and Hove 
Paul Batchelor- Brighton and Hove                           
Matthew Britnell – Lewes 
Chris Jones – Worthing                                  
Robert Counsell – Brighton and Hove 
Belated apologies – Bexhill Chess Club 

1. Chairman’s Opening Remarks and Apologies for Absence 
A round of applause was given to Mark Attree and Peter Farr for their work as secretary and tournament controller earlier in the year.  Jeffrey Boardman introduced himself to the meeting, expressing his gratitude to these colleagues, and that the league would not survive without self-less volunteers giving up personal time to ensure smooth running. It was discussed, that games on the whole had been played in good spirit with no adjournments. Jeffrey talked about the £500,000 grant from the UK government and whether any clubs had ideas for spending the monies, such as applying for grants to grow the game at grass roots.   
2. Minutes of Last Year’s AGM 
The Minutes were approved without comment.  
3. Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising 
As Mark Attree had resigned his post – there was no matters arising from the secretary. 
4. Treasurers Report and Matters Arising 
Robert Wall presented accounts showing a healthy balance of approximately £600 held over 2 accounts.  Arrears from members who had not joined the ECF had fallen significant and in the main resolved, or paid. There were a few new arrears cropping up in the current season but nothing significant. Robert to continue chase the individual clubs for this money. The main issue is that we still are paying a lot of money in fees and do not have an interest bearing account. Robert Wall to investigate switching to Natwest – Antony Higgs mentioned Horsham don’t currently pay any fees on their account with Natwest.  Robert to look to open two accounts including an interest bearing account if there were not fees. It was discussed, how the league proposed to pay for missing cups and whether the current fees of £4 per team were appropriate given they hadn’t been put up for some years? It was agreed that fees would be increased to £6 per team in the future season. It was discussed whether Junior teams could contribute £6 per team towards costs of the new cup as 50% is currently to be funded to the league – agreed that Junior teams will now cost £6 per team in the Junior team league. 
5. Fixture Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising Julie reported as follows: “I volunteered to take on this role mid-season following the decision of the incumbent that he needed to step back.  Having done this task in the past for several years, I felt I understood it and the workload involved.  I was duly appointed by Committee decision.  As a result, this report focuses only on the latter part of the season, once I was in role.“An open issue when I started was the withdrawal of East Grinstead Bookshop’s first team, having already played 2 matches.  I decided the results of the matches they had played should be deleted from Division 2 to avoid distorting the division statistics, but in a way that enabled the individual games that had been played to be graded.  With assistance from David Fryer, this was achieved with those match results transferred to a new pseudo-division called “League Withdrawals”.“On a happier note, I’m pleased to report that all other matches were completed in a timely manner, albeit with some fairly short notice changes of dates.  In this regard, it has been my practice to be prepared to enforce the League rules regarding late requests to reschedule if necessary, but if the teams involved have been able to find an amicable solution, I have not sought to interfere.“I have attempted to monitor individual players’ participation in each team so as to ensure compliance with Rule 4.2.2 concerning nominated players.  I have posted in LMS those players who I’ve noticed have reached the limit of 4 appearances for higher teams.  Whilst I try to spot such cases in a timely manner, it remains the responsibility of individual players and captains to ensure this Rule is adhered to.  Non-compliance can be very costly, as an instance this season showed.  An ineligible player on top board turned a 3.5 – 0.5 win into a 1.5 – 2.5 defeat. 
“Winners of the various divisions and events were:·         
Division 1:  Horsham 1·         
Division 2: East Grinstead 1·         
Division 3: Brighton & Hove 3, with an immaculate record of 10 wins from 10 matches.·         
Junior Rapidplay: East Grinstead Bookshop Juniors 1·         
Knock-Out: Lewes.  
“The anticipated changes for the next season, based on 2-up / 2-down, relative to 2023 / 24 divisions are:·         
Division 1: Hastings & St Leonards 2 and Eastbourne 2 down.·         
Division 2: East Grinstead 1 and Brighton & Hove 2 up, Crowborough 2 and Eastbourne 3 down.·         Division 3: Brighton & Hove 3 and Hastings & St Leonards 3 up.  
“I say “anticipated” as from my past experience I’m aware that changes in team entry numbers may lead to the Committee deciding further adjustments might be needed to keep the divisions reasonably balanced.“I am standing for formal election to the post of Fixtures Secretary for the coming season, but with one caveat as I have already mentioned to club contacts.  I am going to be away for a couple of weeks in mid-September which might make it challenging for me to get fixture lists circulated, or at least posted into LMS, by the deadline stipulated in the Rules of 28th September.  Provided clubs have been diligent in supplying all the information required by the deadline of 14th September, I should have a sporting chance of doing my bit on time.  However, if I still need to be chasing for missing details, or if there are significant changes to team entries that require Committee consideration of the composition of each division, I could have an issue.  At worst, any delay shouldn’t be more than a very few days and not really compromise the start of matches around mid-October.  If elected, I will contact clubs around mid-August detailing the information I require.”   
6. Tournament Controllers Report and Matters Arising 
There had been no disputes or controversies requiring intervention beyond some nomination issues. 
7. Presentation of Trophies 
Division 1 Trophy was received by Antony Higgs of Horsham. 
Division 2 Trophy is to be Presented to Robert Wall of East Grinstead. 
Division 3 Trophy was not returned last – Jeffrey Boardman is to reach out to Sussex University to investigate. 
The Knockout Trophy was received by Jonathan Britnell of Lewes. 
Rapidplay Division Trophy was not available for presentation. 
The tankards for Overall performance, 
Overall Tankard was received by Robert Counsell. 
Division 1 Tankard was received by Luke Rutherford. 
Division 2 Tankard was received by Robert Wall on behalf of Peter Kemp. 
Division 3 Tankard is to Robert Counsell of Brighton and Hove 3 – currently with Jeffrey Boardman.    
8. Election of Officers 
Current officers were re-elected on a show of hands with thanks to David Fryer for the website. There is a vacancy of Secretary which needs to be filled. Currently there were no volunteers from the meeting. 
9.  County Adjudication Secretary’s Report and Matters Arising 
There had been no formal adjudications, although reports of spectators accidently resetting the game clock had emerged. 
10. SCCA Matters relating to the League (and ECF) 
Peter Farr was not in attendance, but Jeffrey Boardman advised of his findings. No significant comments – it was raised whether clubs such as Uckfield (Brian Stockham) wanted to request funding to support better room amenity for next season? Applications for Club of the year were raised – any takers? Nominations to deal with SCCA – no takers but happy for members to speak to Peter Farr should they wish to do this. 
11. Proposed Rule Changes – Team order of strength 
(a) Team Order of strength 
Proposal (Crowborough) 
4 Nominated players Add 4.1.3 For the purpose of declaring nominations the strongest players are determined by their playing strength as defined in 5.2 (the intention is to remove any ambiguity regarding the determination of players strength in selecting nominated players)          
Proposed David Fryer – Approved 10 votes for none against. Rules to be amended. 
(b) The Playing Session 
Proposal (Crowborough) 
8.1.2 Where the FIDE Laws of Chess require the intervention of an arbiter the clock should be stopped and the players should quietly resolve the issue between themselves. If this is not possible then they should retire from the playing area and consult an appropriate member of the home club.  ( the intention is to avoid the disturbance to other players caused by any dispute regarding the Laws of Chess. By appropriate member I mean an experienced player who knows the rules or can look them up and preferably someone who is not currently playing a game in the match.) 
A long discussion of the merits ensued or having other pre-nominated persons. Smaller clubs may have issues with the rules. Proposal was withdrawn. 
12. Location for 2025 AGM Lewes venue seemed ideal, and subject to availability agreed that Lewes is most suitable. 
13.  Any other business 
Discussion on changing the websites name from Mid Sussex to Sussex Chess – David Fryer to look into costs and report back but minimal redirect costs may give others time to update their website so worth considering. 
Expanding Division 2 in the league to East/ West Conference – to be discussed next year in greater detail – so having 4 divisions again. 
Whereabouts of the Division 4 cup queried – found – situated with Peter Farr. 
Question whether Junior teams can have a vote -raised by Brian Stockham of Uckfield or members that do not have any teams in the league. 
The committee indicated this could be something of interest, but as no rule changes were proposed in advance of the meeting this can be discussed next year. 
The committee will meet again in a month to discuss Trophies, engraving. 
The committee are to email clubs in the next few weeks to request that they get entries in. In the absence of a secretary the Chairman offered to take the minutes of the meeting but would be unable to take on the responsibility of being secretary on an ongoing basis as has a young family/ busy job in London. 

Meeting closed at 9.45 pm.

Team Nominations October 2024

Bexhill 1 -
Bexhill 2 -
Bexhill 3-
Brighton & Hove 2 -
Crowborough 1 -
Eastbourne 1 -
Eastbourne 2 -
Eastbourne 3 -
Eastbourne 4 -
East Grinstead 1 -
East Grinstead Bookshop 1 -
Hastings & St.Leonards 1 - 
Hastings & St.Leonards 2 - 
Haywards Heath 1 - 
Haywards Heath 2 - 
Horsham 1 -
Horsham 2 - 
Horsham 3 - 
Horsham 4 - 
Worthing 1 - 

Minutes Seconds Move Max Time
65 30 60 03:10:00
65 30 70 03:20:00
65 30 80 03:30:00
65 30 90 03:40:00
65 30 100 03:50:00

KO Rules 2024-5

Download KO Rules in PDF Format
Knock-Out Competition Rules Operative from September 2024

1. Entry shall be open to one or more teams of four players from each club in the League. Teams wishing to enter shall inform the Tournament Controller (TC) of their intention to do so not later than 14th September. It is a condition of entry that each team nominates a team captain, and submits his/her contact details.

2. The TC shall be appointed by the league. The TC shall be responsible for maintaining the competition as both a smooth-running and an amicable event, and he/she shall be accorded reasonable discretion in the interpretation of these rules to further these ends.

3. The TC shall draw up a pairing tree for the entire competition. Random means shall be used to allocate teams to their initial positions in the tree. Apart from matches postponed from agreed dates by severe weather, any preliminary round matches must be played by 30th October, quarter finals by 15th December, semi-finals by 28th February and the final by 30th April. The pairing tree, the schedule for the completion of the rounds, and a list of the contact details for all team captains shall be sent to all clubs by 1st October.

4. If it is the first match for both teams then the team placed higher in the pairing tree shall play at home. Thereafter the venue shall be determined in order that teams play alternately home and away and to avoid where possible the difference between home and away games for either team being two or higher. Where teams have equal past patterns the team that appears higher in the pairing tree shall alternate.

5. Captains should strive to keep themselves informed of the outcome of matches in collateral branches of the pairing tree, and to make arrangements for the following round at the earliest opportunity. Nevertheless, the TC shall contact captains of victorious teams to inform them of their next opponents. It is then the responsibility of the captain of the home team to contact the captain of the away team within 7 days, and offer at least two dates on which the match can be played within the schedule.

6. Once a player has played in this competition, that player may not subsequently play for another team in this competition in the same season.

7. For the purposes of this competition a player's rating shall be their official ECF standardplay rating from the current month’s rating list.
Captains shall ensure they use the up-to-date list available on the ECF website for all matches. If a player's only rating is a rapidplay rating this shall be used. No player shall appear who does not have a current ECF rating or an estimated rating as determined in advance by the TC (any player who does will be deemed ineligible). The club shall provide to the TC all relevant information concerning an unrated player's strength. This must include, but shall not be limited to, all or any available of the following:

a. previous ECF rating(s) / grade(s) with date(s);
b. current or previous FIDE rating(s) with date(s);
c. current or previous national rating(s) with date(s);
d. recent tournament and league appearances with date(s). In estimating a rating the TC may take into consideration any other relevant information not provided.

8. Each team shall total the ratings of the players actually playing in a match, excluding any player winning or losing by default.

9.
The match shall be handicapped according to the following table:

Difference in Total Rating To Win, higher-rated team must score
0 - 179 No handicap and a 2 - 2 draw resolved first by board count and second by board elimination
180 - 559 The higher rated team must score 2.5 to win and a 2 - 2 result shall count as a win for the lower rated team
560 - 999 The higher rated team must score 3 to win
1000+ The higher rated team must score 3.5 to win

10. If the difference between the total ratings of the teams is less than 180, a level match shall be played, with a 2 - 2 draw being resolved by board count, and, if the board count is equal, by board elimination.   

Board count:
 
Each team totals the numbers on the boards which it won, and the team with the lower count wins the match. E.g. Team A wins on boards 1 and 4; team B wins on boards 3 and 5; board 2 is drawn. A has a board count of 1 + 4 = 5; B has a board count of 3 + 5 = 8; A has the lower count and wins the match. 

Board elimination: 
The score on the bottom board is eliminated, and if the result is still a draw, board 3 is eliminated and then board 2. 

In the event of all games in the match being drawn, the match will be won by the team with the lowest average ECF rating. 

11. The rate of play shall be all moves in 80 minutes with a 10 second increment per move from move 1. No scoring is required by a player once less than five minutes has appeared on that player's clock. 

12. All relevant rules of the League apply to this competition, except the following: 
  a. Read Tournament Controller instead of Fixtures Secretary. 
  b. Section 6 (Defaults) shall not apply. A defaulting team, whether Home or Away, is eliminated from the competition. 
  c. If a League player's club does not enter a team they may play for another club's KO team irrespective of League rule 3.2. 

13. Results (including the computation of handicaps) shall be submitted by the captain of the winning team via the ECF League Management System (LMS) within 2 days of completing the match.  

Sussex County Chess Association [SCCA] 
Adjudication procedure

 
Download Adjudication form in Word Format or Editable PDF
                    
1. Any position submitted for adjudication must reach the Adjudication Secretary within 10 days of the playing of the match. If the position is received after the 10 days then the player's claim will be disallowed.

2. e-mail or First class post must be used in all communication.

If using post, the position will not be accepted as accurate and complete in any of the following  circumstances;
there is no cheque or it is incorrectly completed
there is an error or omission in the claim or the position.

If using email and your claim is not successful, you undertake to pay the fee  within  7 days of the decision. Failure to do so will result in the deduction of one match point from the team.

3. The fees, which are returnable if the claim is upheld, are £5 per position submitted, and an additional £10 for appeals. Cheques to be payable to Sussex County Chess Association. Alternatively, banking details are available upon request, for Bacs payment if preferred. Please, leave identification with payment to enable determination of payee e.g. [Adjudication and club name].

4.  Positions submitted must:
contain only the claim of the submitter and not that of the opponent;
follow the normal conventions, e.g. White at the bottom and Black at the top of the diagram.
where relevant, indicate whether castling is possible or an 'en passant' capture can be played.

5. An appeal procedure is available  where the adjudicator gives a decision different to that claimed by the player. Under this procedure the player has the right  to appeal the decision. To do so, the player or the club's Match Captain must:
lodge the appeal with the Adjudications Secretary within 10 days of the date of receipt of the disputed decision;
submit three copies of the detailed analysis to support the appeal; and 
provide within the same 10 days one copy of the appeal analysis to the opposing team's Match Captain

NEW
email may be used for appeals  [within 10 days of the receipt of the disputed decision].
only one  copy of the detailed analysis need be  to send to the secretary.
one copy to the opposing team's Match Captain
and an undertaking to pay the £10 fee if the appeal is unsuccessful

Within 7 days of receipt of the appeal analysis the Match Captain of the appellant's opposing team is either to:
submit three copies [ or one copy if by email] of any comments/analysis thereon to the Adjudication Secretary; or
inform the Adjudications Secretary that no comments/analysis will be submitted
Adjudication Secretary 
Paul Batchelor 98 Mackie Avenue, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 8RD
01273 508128
P.Batchelor@outlook.com